Forschungsdatenbank PMU-SQQUID

Does the choice of approach for hip hemiarthroplasty in geriatric patients significantly influence early postoperative outcomes? A randomized-controlled trial comparing the modified Smith-Petersen and Hardinge approaches.
Auffarth, A; Resch, H; Lederer, S; Karpik, S; Hitzl, W; Bogner, R; Mayer, M; Matis, N;
J Trauma. 2011; 70(5): 1257-1262.
Originalarbeiten (Zeitschrift)

Abstract/Keywords Web of Science PubMed Full Text

PMU-Autor/inn/en

Auffarth, MSc Alexander
Bogner Robert
Hitzl Wolfgang
Lederer Stefan
Matis Nicholas
Mayer Michael
Resch Herbert

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgical approaches for total hip replacement, such as the modified Smith-Petersen approach, have been reported to be advantageous over alternative techniques because of reduced soft tissue damage and improved immediate postoperative rehabilitation. This study compares the advantages of the Smith-Petersen approach against the lateral Hardinge approach for femoral neck fractures in geriatric patients.

Useful keywords (using NLM MeSH Indexing)

Aged

Aged, 80 and over

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods*

Decision Making*

Female

Femoral Neck Fractures/radiography

Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery*

Follow-Up Studies

Humans

Male

Postoperative Period

Retrospective Studies

Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive/methods*

Time Factors

Treatment Outcome

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)

Modified Smith-Petersen approach
Hardinge approach
Femoral neck fracture
Hip hemiarthroplasty
Minimally invasive surgery