' '
Deutsch | English    

Forschungsdatenbank PMU-SQQUID

Effect of cage design, supplemental posterior instrumentation and approach on primary stability of a lumbar interbody fusion - A biomechanical in vitro study.
Schmoelz, W; Sandriesser, S; Loebl, O; Bauer, M; Krappinger, D;
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2017; 48:30-34
Originalarbeiten (Zeitschrift)

PMU-Autor/inn/en

Sandriesser Sabrina

Abstract

There are various techniques and approaches for lumbar interbody fusion differing in access, cage type and type of supplemental posterior instrumentation. While a transforaminal access usually includes a hemifacetectomy, the facet joint can be preserved with a more lateral extraforaminal access. The supplemental posterior instrumentation required for both fusion techniques is still debated. The purpose of the present study was to compare primary stability of the two accesses for two different cage types with none, unilateral and bilateral supplemental posterior instrumentation.


Useful keywords (using NLM MeSH Indexing)

Aged

Biomechanical Phenomena

Cadaver

Female

Humans

Internal Fixators

Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology

Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*

Lumbosacral Region/surgery*

Male

Middle Aged

Pedicle Screws

Prostheses and Implants

Prosthesis Design

Range of Motion, Articular/physiology*

Spinal Fusion/instrumentation*


Find related publications in this database (Keywords)

Lumbar interbody fusion
TLIF
ELIF
Stand-alone cage
Unilateral internal fixator
Bilateral internal fixator