' '
Deutsch | English    

Forschungsdatenbank PMU-SQQUID

Comparison of prone vs. supine unenhanced CT imaging in patients with clinically suspected ureterolithiasis.
Meissnitzer, M; Meissnitzer, T; Hruby, S; Hecht, S; Gutzeit, A; Holzer-Frühwald, L; Hergan, K; Forstner, R;
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017; 42(2): 569-576.
Originalarbeiten (Zeitschrift)

PMU-Autor/inn/en

Forstner Rosemarie
Gutzeit Andreas
Hergan Klaus
Hruby Stephan
Meißnitzer Thomas
Meissnitzer Matthias

Abstract

PURPOSE
To retrospectively evaluate whether prone CT scanning is superior to supine scanning for correct localization of distal urinary calculi in patients with acute flank pain.
Consecutively performed unenhanced CT scans in patients with acute flank pain were retrospectively analyzed in 150 patients in supine and another 150 patients in prone position. Images were reviewed by two radiologists on consensus. Findings in both groups were compared using two-sided Fisher Exact tests and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
Urinary calculi were found in 67% of patients in each group. In the supine scanning group, there were 16 cases, in which the location of the stone was equivocal being either located intramurally at the ureterovesical junction (UVJ) or having already passed into the bladder. In contrast, in the prone imaging group all distal stones could be allocated accurately, either to the intramural UVJ or the urinary bladder (37 intramural UVJ stones and six bladder stones in prone scanning group vs. 21 intramural UVJ stones and one bladder stone when scanned supine).
Prone scanning is superior to supine CT scanning for acute flank pain to accurately distinguish intramural UVJ stones from stones that have already passed into the bladder, a distinction which influences patient management.


Find related publications in this database (Keywords)

Computed tomography
Urolithiasis
Ureteral calculi
Supine position
Prone position